Skip to main content

It is widely accepted that the directors on the board of a State Sporting Organisation (SSO) or State Sporting Organisation for people with disabilities (SSOD) together with their respective executive team (if any) are the leaders of that organisation.  Those persons are responsible for setting the culture of the SSO through their leadership style and through adopting and promoting a position of integrity for the SSO.

Each board should ensure and actively promote ethical behaviour and decision-making within its organisation.  Good corporate governance ultimately requires people with integrity and leadership to ensure that the reputation of an organisation is managed, protected and enhanced. 

A culture of integrity and ethical behaviour is characterised by: 

  • an effective code of conduct 
  • quality decision-making processes 
  • people of the highest integrity and ethical standards
  • an intent to put the organisation ahead of individual gains. 

The SSO and its board have a major obligation to protect and maintain the integrity of its sport as well as the health and wellbeing of its stakeholders.

The SSO and its board should commit to the highest standards of conduct and ethical behaviour in all of its activities, and to promoting and supporting a culture of honest and ethical behaviour both on-field and off-field, corporate compliance and good corporate governance.

Integrity in sport encompasses all of the elements needed to preserve what is intrinsically valuable about sport and to uphold the principles of fairness, respect, responsibility and safety.  The main policy elements for this include Anti-Doping, Match Fixing and Member Protection, as well as reporting conduct that may prejudice the SSO or Sport or bring either or both of them into disrepute. 

The SSO board must enforce its rules and the rules of the sport fairly but in the best interests of the Sport and its stakeholders.

Top of page